<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPad the Spork</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2010/04/07/ipad-the-spork/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2010/04/07/ipad-the-spork/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ipad-the-spork</link>
	<description>USC professor and author of The Wikipedia Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2010/04/07/ipad-the-spork/comment-page-1/#comment-342309</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/?p=505#comment-342309</guid>
		<description>my ipad have some display problems and i cannot fix the damn thing *,,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my ipad have some display problems and i cannot fix the damn thing *,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mads</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2010/04/07/ipad-the-spork/comment-page-1/#comment-313589</link>
		<dc:creator>Mads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 10:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/?p=505#comment-313589</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious why people suddenly will become passive, cultural dupes - is reading, watching, appreciating, suddenly a passive activity? Why is close and concentrated engagement with a product suddenly considered culturally inferior to pseudo-active &quot;social&quot; media use? I&#039;d like to think that the &quot;passive&quot; or, as I would have it, engaged or attentive mode of consuming is the prerequisite for actual participation - i.e. you have to consume knowledge before being able to change, challenge, reproduce, or participate in knowledge creation. 

That, and we can see the iPad as a possible platform for DIY publishing - ie. when the hardware on which you consume Penguin books is no different from the one on which you consume a self-published text book, I think people will be inclined to produce high-quality stuff too. 

All in all, I see it as a brilliant form factor for consumption and as a supplement to tools for making - also, will it not bring the long tail of fringe productions closer to a general public rather than the twittering Linux, CC obsessed social media crowd (of course, that would challenge our right to complain about the passive &quot;crowds&quot;...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious why people suddenly will become passive, cultural dupes &#8211; is reading, watching, appreciating, suddenly a passive activity? Why is close and concentrated engagement with a product suddenly considered culturally inferior to pseudo-active &#8220;social&#8221; media use? I&#8217;d like to think that the &#8220;passive&#8221; or, as I would have it, engaged or attentive mode of consuming is the prerequisite for actual participation &#8211; i.e. you have to consume knowledge before being able to change, challenge, reproduce, or participate in knowledge creation. </p>
<p>That, and we can see the iPad as a possible platform for DIY publishing &#8211; ie. when the hardware on which you consume Penguin books is no different from the one on which you consume a self-published text book, I think people will be inclined to produce high-quality stuff too. </p>
<p>All in all, I see it as a brilliant form factor for consumption and as a supplement to tools for making &#8211; also, will it not bring the long tail of fringe productions closer to a general public rather than the twittering Linux, CC obsessed social media crowd (of course, that would challenge our right to complain about the passive &#8220;crowds&#8221;&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2010/04/07/ipad-the-spork/comment-page-1/#comment-312621</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/?p=505#comment-312621</guid>
		<description>Werdna: I consider it lean back in terms of ergonomics and OS function. It doesn&#039;t have a keyboard to hunch over, so you&#039;re certainly not leaning forward, because you&#039;re not at the ready at the keys or mousepad. It&#039;s also not multitasking and the entire experience is controlled by the content creator, so you have nothing to do but completely focus on exactly what&#039;s in front of you. For those reasons, I do wind up using it much more in &quot;lean back&quot; mode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Werdna: I consider it lean back in terms of ergonomics and OS function. It doesn&#8217;t have a keyboard to hunch over, so you&#8217;re certainly not leaning forward, because you&#8217;re not at the ready at the keys or mousepad. It&#8217;s also not multitasking and the entire experience is controlled by the content creator, so you have nothing to do but completely focus on exactly what&#8217;s in front of you. For those reasons, I do wind up using it much more in &#8220;lean back&#8221; mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2010/04/07/ipad-the-spork/comment-page-1/#comment-312619</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/?p=505#comment-312619</guid>
		<description>Pfctdayelise, the lean-forward vs lean-back paradigm is something talked about much in the interactive television space. Perhaps I thought it was more widespread than it is, because I thought I was restating a well known model! :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_television

I think until now everyone thought of it as old media (lean back) vs new media (lean forward), but the iPad is new media AND lean back, which throws folks for a loop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pfctdayelise, the lean-forward vs lean-back paradigm is something talked about much in the interactive television space. Perhaps I thought it was more widespread than it is, because I thought I was restating a well known model! <img src='http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_television" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_television</a></p>
<p>I think until now everyone thought of it as old media (lean back) vs new media (lean forward), but the iPad is new media AND lean back, which throws folks for a loop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ella</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2010/04/07/ipad-the-spork/comment-page-1/#comment-312617</link>
		<dc:creator>Ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/?p=505#comment-312617</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s ingenious, Andrew! It really is the best analogy of iPad I&#039;ve ever heard!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s ingenious, Andrew! It really is the best analogy of iPad I&#8217;ve ever heard!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfctdayelise</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2010/04/07/ipad-the-spork/comment-page-1/#comment-312609</link>
		<dc:creator>pfctdayelise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/?p=505#comment-312609</guid>
		<description>Andrew is this &quot;lean forward&quot;/&quot;lean back&quot; analogy yours? I quite like it and might borrow it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew is this &#8220;lean forward&#8221;/&#8221;lean back&#8221; analogy yours? I quite like it and might borrow it <img src='http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Garrett</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2010/04/07/ipad-the-spork/comment-page-1/#comment-312597</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Garrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 05:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/?p=505#comment-312597</guid>
		<description>Can somebody please explain to me what it is about the iPad that is so &quot;lean-back&quot;? I&#039;ve seen it echoed around the web, but I&#039;ve never seen any justification for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can somebody please explain to me what it is about the iPad that is so &#8220;lean-back&#8221;? I&#8217;ve seen it echoed around the web, but I&#8217;ve never seen any justification for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

