Comments on: Wikipedia’s Hitwise Numbers http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2009/01/31/wikipedias-hitwise-numbers/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=wikipedias-hitwise-numbers USC professor and author of The Wikipedia Revolution Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:18:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: pfctdayelise http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2009/01/31/wikipedias-hitwise-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-306594 pfctdayelise Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:12:35 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2009/01/31/wikipedias-hitwise-numbers/#comment-306594 It's almost bizarre to have a monopoly on a freely licensed site, isn't it? Guess it just shows you the power of the network. It’s almost bizarre to have a monopoly on a freely licensed site, isn’t it? Guess it just shows you the power of the network.

]]> By: GerardM http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2009/01/31/wikipedias-hitwise-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-306394 GerardM Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:29:54 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2009/01/31/wikipedias-hitwise-numbers/#comment-306394 Given that Wikipedia is in effect a monopoly, would you agree with me that it is for Wikipedia to make sure that they are as open as feasible when it comes to their data and practices ? Do you agree that the current templates are as effective in preventing reuse as the shifting logic of Microsoft products ? Thanks, GerardM Given that Wikipedia is in effect a monopoly, would you agree with me that it is for Wikipedia to make sure that they are as open as feasible when it comes to their data and practices ?

Do you agree that the current templates are as effective in preventing reuse as the shifting logic of Microsoft products ?
Thanks,
GerardM

]]>