Comments on: Valleywag and Erik Moeller http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/ New Media researcher Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:19:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Internet et logiciels http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164927 Mon, 12 May 2008 11:40:10 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164927 <strong>The Erik Möller case and freedom of speech...</strong> A little historical and political perspective on the latest tabloid scandal around Wikipedia.... The Erik Möller case and freedom of speech…

A little historical and political perspective on the latest tabloid scandal around Wikipedia….

]]> by: Anonymous http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164512 Sun, 11 May 2008 19:15:29 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164512 Srsly, ask them--I dare you. Srsly, ask them–I dare you.

]]> by: Torsten http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164486 Sun, 11 May 2008 18:19:53 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164486 Uh, corrupt Wikipedia admins. They don't run checkusers without a reason. Uh, corrupt Wikipedia admins. They don’t run checkusers without a reason.

]]> by: Anonymous http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164459 Sun, 11 May 2008 16:36:59 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164459 They won't run one; it would be too awful for their reputation. They won’t run one; it would be too awful for their reputation.

]]> by: Torsten http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164442 Sun, 11 May 2008 15:56:52 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164442 Do it yourself and give them some good reasons to do so. Do it yourself and give them some good reasons to do so.

]]> by: Anonymous http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164386 Sun, 11 May 2008 13:27:37 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164386 Ask Wikipedia to do a checkuser on Eloquence (Moller's main account) and AnotherSolipsist, and see what they say. Ask Wikipedia to do a checkuser on Eloquence (Moller’s main account) and AnotherSolipsist, and see what they say.

]]> by: Torsten http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164261 Sun, 11 May 2008 06:52:30 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164261 Anonymous: "proof" and "probably" don't mix. Either you have proof or you suspect something. Until now I haven't seen anything that indicates that Erik actually advocates paedophilia. Anonymous: “proof” and “probably” don’t mix. Either you have proof or you suspect something.

Until now I haven’t seen anything that indicates that Erik actually advocates paedophilia.

]]> by: Anonymous http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164183 Sun, 11 May 2008 03:31:55 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164183 Yes, the proof that he has been "actively pushing" for pedophilia is the sockpuppet he probably uses, called "AnotherSolipsist" (which was even blocked for 72 hours for pushing pedophilia...) Yes, the proof that he has been “actively pushing” for pedophilia is the sockpuppet he probably uses, called “AnotherSolipsist” (which was even blocked for 72 hours for pushing pedophilia…)

]]> by: llywrch http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164147 Sun, 11 May 2008 01:40:35 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164147 "Buffet", do you have proof that Erik Moeller has been "actively pushing" for pedophilia? Or is this claim a sloppy generalization akin to your claim that there are "massive amounts of hard core pornographic images ... flooding Wikipedia"? As for the grantmakers concern, if it *is* an issue for them all they have to do is communicate to the Foundation that for the money to appear Moeller has to go. I don't know what their thinking is at this moment. As I wrote above, money talks: the Foundation can't tell him to go, but the grantors can. Geoff “Buffet”, do you have proof that Erik Moeller has been “actively pushing” for pedophilia? Or is this claim a sloppy generalization akin to your claim that there are “massive amounts of hard core pornographic images … flooding Wikipedia”?

As for the grantmakers concern, if it *is* an issue for them all they have to do is communicate to the Foundation that for the money to appear Moeller has to go. I don’t know what their thinking is at this moment. As I wrote above, money talks: the Foundation can’t tell him to go, but the grantors can.

Geoff

]]> by: Anonymous http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164139 Sun, 11 May 2008 01:17:41 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/08/valleywag-and-erik-moeller/#comment-164139 ...and what about all the pro-pedophilia crap he wrote with his likely sockpuppet, AnotherSolipsist? …and what about all the pro-pedophilia crap he wrote with his likely sockpuppet, AnotherSolipsist?

]]>