<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buffet on China</title>
	<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/06/buffet-on-china/</link>
	<description>New Media researcher</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mary Nicole Nazzaro</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/06/buffet-on-china/#comment-165540</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/06/buffet-on-china/#comment-165540</guid>
					<description>Thanks Andrew for a great post - it's most definitely the case that very few media outlets in the West succeed in putting the China story in its proper historical context, so it's enlightening to hear that Buffett and Munger are willing to go there. Hope all is well with you in Beijing - hope to see you this summer! ~ Nicole</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andrew for a great post - it&#8217;s most definitely the case that very few media outlets in the West succeed in putting the China story in its proper historical context, so it&#8217;s enlightening to hear that Buffett and Munger are willing to go there. Hope all is well with you in Beijing - hope to see you this summer! ~ Nicole
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joseph  Reagle</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/06/buffet-on-china/#comment-161838</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2008/05/06/buffet-on-china/#comment-161838</guid>
					<description>There is an amazingly naive historical/moral fallacy that inhibits reform in Buffett's statement: &quot;in the end those issues were resolved.&quot; And how were those issues resolved? By protest and criticism. Whether and the extent to which engagement with China is effective is an intersting policy question subject subject to social and political science but if we did not permit productive criticism because no one is perfect, no one would improve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an amazingly naive historical/moral fallacy that inhibits reform in Buffett&#8217;s statement: &#8220;in the end those issues were resolved.&#8221; And how were those issues resolved? By protest and criticism. Whether and the extent to which engagement with China is effective is an intersting policy question subject subject to social and political science but if we did not permit productive criticism because no one is perfect, no one would improve.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
