<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN &#8220;frees&#8221; US political debate</title>
	<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/</link>
	<description>New Media researcher</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-47821</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-47821</guid>
					<description>I echo David Gerard; it's hard to believe they'll release it without some sort of license, CC or otherwise.  Have they specified that?

Oh, and Wikipedia is unblocked today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo David Gerard; it&#8217;s hard to believe they&#8217;ll release it without some sort of license, CC or otherwise.  Have they specified that?</p>
<p>Oh, and Wikipedia is unblocked today.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-45804</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-45804</guid>
					<description>Sorry I'm digressing - but Flickr is blocked in China.  This reminded me of the first time Wikipedia was blocked, which was quite close to the June Fourth as well.  Hope its access will be allowed soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I&#8217;m digressing - but Flickr is blocked in China.  This reminded me of the first time Wikipedia was blocked, which was quite close to the June Fourth as well.  Hope its access will be allowed soon&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: darrel forney</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-38903</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 13:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-38903</guid>
					<description>What are the dates for cnn and fox's debates</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the dates for cnn and fox&#8217;s debates
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mahathir_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-38372</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 09:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-38372</guid>
					<description>Presidential debates in the US is still not free.

For starters, Americans are brainwashed to believe that only a Democrat or a Republican can ever be President.

As a result, even the primaries which is supposed to be a party affair is being funded with government money and conducted on government property. No other democracies in the world would allow a party's primary to be funded with government money. By financing the primaries of the political parties of Democrat and Repulican primaries with public money, the government of the US is unofficially endorsing a 2 party system.

Secondly, there is no need to emphasize the need for the average American to watch these Presidential debates. Americans should instead be proactive and run for the President themselves. yes, I am asking you, if you are an American to prove that your country is indeed a democracy by running for the election of the President of the United States. Why? Too hard? Realize now that you may not be as democratic as you once thought you were? Run for President. Submit your name. And let's see how far you can actually get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presidential debates in the US is still not free.</p>
<p>For starters, Americans are brainwashed to believe that only a Democrat or a Republican can ever be President.</p>
<p>As a result, even the primaries which is supposed to be a party affair is being funded with government money and conducted on government property. No other democracies in the world would allow a party&#8217;s primary to be funded with government money. By financing the primaries of the political parties of Democrat and Repulican primaries with public money, the government of the US is unofficially endorsing a 2 party system.</p>
<p>Secondly, there is no need to emphasize the need for the average American to watch these Presidential debates. Americans should instead be proactive and run for the President themselves. yes, I am asking you, if you are an American to prove that your country is indeed a democracy by running for the election of the President of the United States. Why? Too hard? Realize now that you may not be as democratic as you once thought you were? Run for President. Submit your name. And let&#8217;s see how far you can actually get.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-38219</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 10:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-38219</guid>
					<description>It'll boost us &lt;i&gt;if&lt;/i&gt; it's under an actually free license. Have they stated the terms? Is -nc or -nd in the terms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll boost us <i>if</i> it&#8217;s under an actually free license. Have they stated the terms? Is -nc or -nd in the terms?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-38079</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 20:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/05/05/cnn-frees-us-political-debate/#comment-38079</guid>
					<description>This could give a real boost to Wikipedia's political coverage, and add some pressure for developing integrated video capability.  We could have short clips in candidate's articles where they give their policy statements, etc., and on Wikinews, an article on each debate that has the full video, plus summarizes the high points of the punditry response; assuming this policy remains in effect, this could make Wikinews a go-to source for people other than Wikimedians by the next election cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could give a real boost to Wikipedia&#8217;s political coverage, and add some pressure for developing integrated video capability.  We could have short clips in candidate&#8217;s articles where they give their policy statements, etc., and on Wikinews, an article on each debate that has the full video, plus summarizes the high points of the punditry response; assuming this policy remains in effect, this could make Wikinews a go-to source for people other than Wikimedians by the next election cycle.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
