<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google at Davos - Conflicting Reports</title>
	<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/</link>
	<description>New Media researcher</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Scentless Apprentice</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/#comment-15763</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/#comment-15763</guid>
					<description>The CNN/Fortune article was dated January 2006 so it was an interview of Sergey at the Davos conference over a year ago when the news about Google setting up a censored Chinese search engine just came to light.

The Guardian's article reflected how Sergey felt one year after the debut of Google.cn.

I hope this clear up any confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CNN/Fortune article was dated January 2006 so it was an interview of Sergey at the Davos conference over a year ago when the news about Google setting up a censored Chinese search engine just came to light.</p>
<p>The Guardian&#8217;s article reflected how Sergey felt one year after the debut of Google.cn.</p>
<p>I hope this clear up any confusion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AsiaPundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2007-01-31</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/#comment-12664</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/#comment-12664</guid>
					<description>[...] CHINA - Google at Davos - Conflicting Reports &amp;#8221; At the time, I was wary about the newspaper partnering with an advocacy group. This is exactly what I was worried about — putting activism into the mix starts to raise doubt about a paper’s ability to faithfully report the news.&amp;#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] CHINA - Google at Davos - Conflicting Reports &#8221; At the time, I was wary about the newspaper partnering with an advocacy group. This is exactly what I was worried about — putting activism into the mix starts to raise doubt about a paper’s ability to faithfully report the news.&#8221; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/#comment-12476</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/#comment-12476</guid>
					<description>After you are done talking with Sergey, can you shoot him over to me, so I can interview him for my magazine? 

I think you've gone ahead and done a great thing by pulling these two quotes and looking at them carefully. I won't lay any judgements down on the paper of record, but I do wonder if this is a normal thing for them. The Google case is much more financially technical than people give it credit for being.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After you are done talking with Sergey, can you shoot him over to me, so I can interview him for my magazine? </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve gone ahead and done a great thing by pulling these two quotes and looking at them carefully. I won&#8217;t lay any judgements down on the paper of record, but I do wonder if this is a normal thing for them. The Google case is much more financially technical than people give it credit for being.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Blocked in China &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google at Davos - Conflicting Reports</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/#comment-12389</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/#comment-12389</guid>
					<description>[...] Google at Davos - Conflicting Reports By andrew [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Google at Davos - Conflicting Reports By andrew [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Fons Tuinstra</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/#comment-12372</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 08:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2007/01/29/google-at-davos-conflicting-reports/#comment-12372</guid>
					<description>I agree that they do not seem very well informed, Andrew. The situation on universities can be slightly different from the rest of China, but it is nonsense to say that Google was 50 percent of the time unavailable.
Now, whatever they decide, it will only be symbolic, since the Google services are very well available (even able to circumvent the recent problems with the telecommunication cables), Earlier news suggested that very few people are using Google.cn anyway. Why would you if you have also Google.com at hand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that they do not seem very well informed, Andrew. The situation on universities can be slightly different from the rest of China, but it is nonsense to say that Google was 50 percent of the time unavailable.<br />
Now, whatever they decide, it will only be symbolic, since the Google services are very well available (even able to circumvent the recent problems with the telecommunication cables), Earlier news suggested that very few people are using Google.cn anyway. Why would you if you have also Google.com at hand?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
