<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia in China still ranks high</title>
	<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/</link>
	<description>New Media researcher</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Male celebrities nude.</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/#comment-211897</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/#comment-211897</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Male nude celebrities....&lt;/strong&gt;

Nude female celebrities. Free nude celebrities. Gay celebrities. Celebrities getting fucked. Celebrities pictures. Where can i see pictures of celebrities. Nude pictures celebrities. Nude celebrities....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Male nude celebrities&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Nude female celebrities. Free nude celebrities. Gay celebrities. Celebrities getting fucked. Celebrities pictures. Where can i see pictures of celebrities. Nude pictures celebrities. Nude celebrities&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yam Ki Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/#comment-8226</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/#comment-8226</guid>
					<description>You probablyalready know this--there's also a China wiki (http://www.wikilib.com/), although it's plastered with ads.  There's also a Wiki Mirror in English!--(http://en.wikilib.org/wiki/Main_Page).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probablyalready know this&#8211;there&#8217;s also a China wiki (http://www.wikilib.com/), although it&#8217;s plastered with ads.  There&#8217;s also a Wiki Mirror in English!&#8211;(http://en.wikilib.org/wiki/Main_Page).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AsiaPundit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; links for 2006-12-21</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/#comment-7425</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/#comment-7425</guid>
					<description>[...] CHINA - Wikipedia in China still ranks high &amp;#8220;Despite still being widely blocked in China, Wikipedia still ranks high according to China Websites Ranking (中国网站排名). It’s the #1 online encyclopedia, and the #3 overall reference site.&amp;#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] CHINA - Wikipedia in China still ranks high &#8220;Despite still being widely blocked in China, Wikipedia still ranks high according to China Websites Ranking (中国网站排名). It’s the #1 online encyclopedia, and the #3 overall reference site.&#8221; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/#comment-7360</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/#comment-7360</guid>
					<description>Nick, it would seem so. But again, since these are Alexa-like methods, some things could be wildly off mark. But just a spot check to the wiki encyclopedias above indicate they are much fancier than Baidu Baike. The former tend to use Mediawiki or something as powerful, while Baidu Baike seems a bit more anemic. 

But I am surprised too that Baidu Baike does not even place in the top seven. Will see if anyone else has any theories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, it would seem so. But again, since these are Alexa-like methods, some things could be wildly off mark. But just a spot check to the wiki encyclopedias above indicate they are much fancier than Baidu Baike. The former tend to use Mediawiki or something as powerful, while Baidu Baike seems a bit more anemic. </p>
<p>But I am surprised too that Baidu Baike does not even place in the top seven. Will see if anyone else has any theories.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Nick Moreau</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/#comment-7359</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/12/19/wikipedia-in-china-still-ranks-high/#comment-7359</guid>
					<description>Am I correct in reading that four other the other top encyclopedia sites are wikis, and that Baidu Baike doesn't make the list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I correct in reading that four other the other top encyclopedia sites are wikis, and that Baidu Baike doesn&#8217;t make the list?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
