<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Wikipedia&#8217;s Re-Block</title>
	<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/</link>
	<description>New Media researcher</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: River</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4840</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 11:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4840</guid>
					<description>这就叫”打太极“了。答完之后你才会发现回答是跟问题完全武关的。ZF最懂得这样回答问题。

    Q: 此外，去年10月以来一直被封杀的维基百科中文网站上周得以解禁，你对此有何评论？

    A: 我不清楚你提到的具体网站情况。中国政府积极支持和促进互联网的发展。截止2005年，中国上网用户已超过1.23亿人，中国网站数量达78.8万个。中国已成为世界第二大互联网国家。我们依法对互联网进行管理，这也是世界各国通行的做法。</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>这就叫”打太极“了。答完之后你才会发现回答是跟问题完全武关的。ZF最懂得这样回答问题。</p>
<p>    Q: 此外，去年10月以来一直被封杀的维基百科中文网站上周得以解禁，你对此有何评论？</p>
<p>    A: 我不清楚你提到的具体网站情况。中国政府积极支持和促进互联网的发展。截止2005年，中国上网用户已超过1.23亿人，中国网站数量达78.8万个。中国已成为世界第二大互联网国家。我们依法对互联网进行管理，这也是世界各国通行的做法。
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Global Voices Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; China: wikipedia blocked, unblocked and reblocked</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4732</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 03:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4732</guid>
					<description>[...] The news about Chinese wikipedia has been confusing. On Nov 13, it was widely accessible, on Nov 16, partial inaccessible, on Nov 17, a reblocked was confirmed and appeared more restrictive.    Oiwan Lam [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The news about Chinese wikipedia has been confusing. On Nov 13, it was widely accessible, on Nov 16, partial inaccessible, on Nov 17, a reblocked was confirmed and appeared more restrictive.    Oiwan Lam [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew Lih &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How many Chinese users familiar with Wiki?</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4554</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 01:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4554</guid>
					<description>[...] After Wikipedia received press attention this week, and the Chinese term (維基百科) showed up the government Foreign Ministry transcripts, someone asked me an interesting question: How many people in China know what the Chinese word for &amp;#8220;wiki&amp;#8221; or Wikipedia? One out of ten, 1/100, 1/1000 or even less? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] After Wikipedia received press attention this week, and the Chinese term (維基百科) showed up the government Foreign Ministry transcripts, someone asked me an interesting question: How many people in China know what the Chinese word for &#8220;wiki&#8221; or Wikipedia? One out of ten, 1/100, 1/1000 or even less? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mahathir_fan</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4536</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4536</guid>
					<description>don't worry. wikipedia may be blocked but that doesn't prevent chinese people from obtaining knowledge. we still have lots of other encylopedias on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t worry. wikipedia may be blocked but that doesn&#8217;t prevent chinese people from obtaining knowledge. we still have lots of other encylopedias on the internet.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: fff</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4511</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 13:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4511</guid>
					<description>dsfas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dsfas
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter Guo</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4494</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4494</guid>
					<description>I have nothing to say, and nothing to complain, because I have been dumb with the situations that blocked-unblocked-reblocked on Wikipedia. After I said Wikipedia is unblocked yesterday, it's no more than one day that Wikipedia blocked again in Fujian district.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing to say, and nothing to complain, because I have been dumb with the situations that blocked-unblocked-reblocked on Wikipedia. After I said Wikipedia is unblocked yesterday, it&#8217;s no more than one day that Wikipedia blocked again in Fujian district.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter Guo</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4493</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 08:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4493</guid>
					<description>I have nothing to say, and nothing to complain, because I . After I said Wikipedia is unblocked yesterday, it's no more than one day that Wikipedia blocked again in Fujian district.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing to say, and nothing to complain, because I . After I said Wikipedia is unblocked yesterday, it&#8217;s no more than one day that Wikipedia blocked again in Fujian district.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Julien Pain</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4435</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/11/17/understanding-wikipedias-re-block/#comment-4435</guid>
					<description>Fi,
I'm trying to confirm this information.
If true, it's a very very bad news.
Whatever may happens next, thanks to Wikipedia for refusing self-censorship.
Julien
Reporters Wihtout Borders</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fi,<br />
I&#8217;m trying to confirm this information.<br />
If true, it&#8217;s a very very bad news.<br />
Whatever may happens next, thanks to Wikipedia for refusing self-censorship.<br />
Julien<br />
Reporters Wihtout Borders
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
