Why did China finally unblock Wikipedia?

With my recent reporting on the Wikipedia block being lifted, many people have asked me, “Why do you think Wikipedia was finally unblocked in China?”

I believe it was because of the argument Jimmy Wales and fellow Chinese Wikipedians have consistently put forth — Wikipedia has a neutral point of view at its core, with no activist or subversive agenda to the site. In the end, I believe consensus among the authorities determined the benefits of Wikipedia far outweigh the risks, and signals their understanding of the beneficial nature of the emerging read-write Web. Read on for an explanation.

It took some time for government censors to get used to the wiki concept. The nature of China’s authorities is to fear what they don’t understand. But this is not unique to China. You don’t have to be a skeptical, authoritarian government to doubt the legitimacy and neutrality of Wikipedia. Commentators Robert McHenry and Nicholas Carr have been prominent skeptics. For rich irony, see Jaron Lanier’s gripe about Wikipedia called “Digital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism.” (That title alone should buy some credibility with China’s leaders). So after a year of watching Wikipedia rise in popularity, Chinese authorities understand the wiki phenemenon more and realize sitting on the sidelines is disadvantageous in two ways.

Dual Harm

The complete argument goes like this: With Wikipedia blocked, China suffers because its ranks of knowledge workers cannot access the top reference site in the world, and the world suffers from not having China’s expertise and input in Wikipedia. Sound familiar? This is a direct example of Wikipedia as the ultimate implementation of what Lawrence Lessig calls “read-write” culture.

China wants to read it, the world wants China to write to it.

Opening access to Wikipedia would be win-win, and the folks who unblocked Wikipedia likely realized this.


More importantly though, this provides insight on how to effect change in the PRC, something I’ve been emphasizing for years – encourage China to approach the table, to join the benefits on their own motivation, and allowing them to “tap in.” Unfortunately, this has often not been the approach of Western governments or NGOs.

What doesn’t work? Pushing China solely on issues of freedom of speech, civil liberties for the sake of human rights. It’s just too easy to dismiss these as meddling, imperialistic Western viewpoints used as wedge issues. Do not forget, China was the victim of imperialistic designs which still have a deep effect on the psyche of Chinese leaders and issues of trust.

What does work? Asking China to join the community, because China’s knowledge workers are missing out on the best resource in the world and a resource that US and Indian engineers, scientists, academics and citizens are already using to increase their economic competitiveness. That’s the economic argument.

Also, Wikipedia benefits from having more PRC knowhow to improve its content in arts, history, culture and regional knowledge. China considers itself the vanguard of Chinese culture. Whether this is true or not, a Wikipedia with very few PRC contributions is certainly a concern for them. This is likely to have influenced the decision to allow their own citizens to influence the site, to balance out the majority comprised of Hong Kong and Taiwan contributors. That’s the cultural argument.

Blocking Bad, Filtering Less-bad

If we assume the authorities believe in allowing Wikipedia’s read-write culture into the PRC, but still fear subversive and “unharmonious” content, there is a compelling technical argument for unblocking — you don’t need a block on Wikipedia’s entire site by IP address, when the Great Firewall has finer grained URL- and Web page-level blocking that would suffice. While blocking at this level is not something Wikipedians would be happy to see, it’s certainly better than a wholesale block.

(This leads to a paradox — better technology in China’s Internet filtering methods could actually result in more sites being accessible.)

No one ever knows exactly why a block is put in place in China, or why its lifted. But in this case, it looks like the traffic is flowing, and users are signing up in the thousands. There will be more interesting stories of the “write” part of this story, as more PRC users become members of the editing community. Already, administrators in ZH are reverting a new wave of copyright violations, mainly from newbies who don’t quite understand Wikipedias free content license yet. But this is to be expected, and it is something they will learn quickly. Their influence in the community will be fascinating to watch.

And in the end, if you think about it, doesn’t it make complete sense that the People’s Republic of China would embrace the people’s encyclopedia of Wikipedia?

125 thoughts on “Why did China finally unblock Wikipedia?

  1. I don’t know if it’s just me or if perhaps everyone else experiencing
    issues with your blog. It appears like some of the written text in your content are running off the screen. Can somebody else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them as
    well? This might be a issue with my web browser because I’ve had this happen previously.
    Many thanks

  2. ??????????????????????????????????




  3. Thanks for your personal marvelous posting! I actually enjoyed
    reading it, you may be a great author.I will remember
    to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back very soon.
    I want to encourage you to definitely continue your great posts,
    have a nice holiday weekend!

  4. Fantastic website. A lot of helpful information here.
    I am sending it to a few pals ans additionally sharing in delicious.

    And of course, thanks for your effort!

  5. Thank you so much for giving everyone such a spectacular
    opportunity to check tips from this site. It is always so lovely plus full of
    amusement for me and my office mates to visit the blog at the very least three times
    in a week to read through the fresh issues you have got.
    And definitely, I’m so actually fulfilled with the remarkable hints you give.
    Some 3 areas in this article are unequivocally the most beneficial we’ve ever had.

  6. I have read several good stuff here. Certainly price bookmarking for revisiting.
    I surprise how so much attempt you place to make such a excellent informative web site.

  7. Thank you, I have recently been looking for info about this subject for a
    long time and yours is the best I have came upon so far.
    But, what about the conclusion? Are you certain in regards to the source?

  8. Hmm it looks like your blog ate my first comment (it was super
    long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog.
    I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new
    to the whole thing. Do you have any suggestions for first-time blog writers?
    I’d really appreciate it.

  9. Ey! estuve mirando durante unas 3 horas en las webs hoy y no ojee nada
    tan increible como tu escrito. Me ha impactado mucho la manera que posees al escribir
    imagino que es lo que me ha llegado. A mi parecer, si muchos de los
    los propietarios de webs crearan estos escritos, Internet seria
    mucho mas practico. Espero que te mantengas por esta linea y siga bebiendo
    textos tan geniales como este.

  10. Having read this I thought it was extremely enlightening.

    I appreciate you spending some time and effort to put this information together.
    I once again find myself spending way too much time both reading and commenting.
    But so what, it was still worth it!

  11. Right here is the right site for anybody who would like to find out about this topic.
    You know so much its almost tough to argue with you (not that I really would want to?HaHa).

    You definitely put a new spin on a subject which has been written about for a
    long time. Great stuff, just great!

  12. Unquestionably consider that which you stated. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the net the simplest
    factor to take into account of. I say to you, I certainly get irked even as folks think about
    issues that they plainly don’t understand about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top as smartly as defined out the whole thing with no
    need side effect , folks can take a signal. Will probably be again to get more.

    Thank you!

  13. Thank you, I have just been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours is the best I have discovered till now.

    However, what concerning the bottom line? Are you sure in regards to the source?

  14. ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>