Comments on: Wikipedia vs. Citizendium http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/ New Media researcher Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:07:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: superduper18 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-133434 Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:21:11 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-133434 The Citizen's Compendium, Citizendium is going to kick wikipedia's ass in the future, not now since its new. but citizendium had more articles and quality than wikipedia had in its first year The Citizen’s Compendium, Citizendium is going to kick wikipedia’s ass in the future, not now since its new. but citizendium had more articles and quality than wikipedia had in its first year

]]> by: RadicalAndrew http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-24366 Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:24:46 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-24366 Will Memphis win it all? I doubt it. My money is going on Georgetown, Texas, or Kansas. But ya never know.. Somebody could come up and win it all from nowhere. But please enough of Florida already! Will Memphis win it all? I doubt it. My money is going on Georgetown, Texas, or Kansas. But ya never know..

Somebody could come up and win it all from nowhere. But please enough of Florida already!

]]> by: Stan http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-16366 Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:39:56 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-16366 WIKIpedia-rulezzz! IMHO WIKIpedia-rulezzz!
IMHO

]]> by: Tapera » el doctor citizendium contra la wikipedia http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-2073 Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:21:24 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-2073 [...] posdata: If:Book tiene tres posts de opinión sobre el tema; y en el blog de Andrew Lih puede leerse el mejor intento de comparar la vieja Nupedia con el nuevo proyecto de Larry Sanger. Aparentemente, el mismo Sanger contesta. [...] […] posdata: If:Book tiene tres posts de opinión sobre el tema; y en el blog de Andrew Lih puede leerse el mejor intento de comparar la vieja Nupedia con el nuevo proyecto de Larry Sanger. Aparentemente, el mismo Sanger contesta. […]

]]> by: infobong.com » linkdump for 2006.09.22 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-2053 Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:58:42 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-2053 [...] Andrew Lih: Wikipedia vs. Citizendium Andrew Lih expresses skepticism about Citizendium. (tags: wikipedia production) [...] […] Andrew Lih: Wikipedia vs. Citizendium Andrew Lih expresses skepticism about Citizendium. (tags: wikipedia production) […]

]]> by: …My heart’s in Accra » links for 2006-09-22 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-2024 Fri, 22 Sep 2006 04:20:25 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-2024 [...] Andrew Lih � Blog Archive � Wikipedia vs. Citizendium Really interesting update on a fork of Wikipedia attempting to creat e a “quality” version for academic use (tags: wikipedia) [...] […] Andrew Lih � Blog Archive � Wikipedia vs. Citizendium Really interesting update on a fork of Wikipedia attempting to creat e a “quality” version for academic use (tags: wikipedia) […]

]]> by: andrew http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-2018 Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:46:06 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-2018 Well to be clear, Citizendium is not anything yet. :) But obviously on the verge of being implemented and your point is noted. My point, however, is not a matter of mechanics, in terms of whether CZ looks more like WP or NP. Rather, when talking about perspective and assumptions, CZ has an affinity with NP's model for providing a place of privilege for experts. Well to be clear, Citizendium is not anything yet. :) But obviously on the verge of being implemented and your point is noted.

My point, however, is not a matter of mechanics, in terms of whether CZ looks more like WP or NP. Rather, when talking about perspective and assumptions, CZ has an affinity with NP’s model for providing a place of privilege for experts.

]]> by: Larry Sanger http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-2005 Thu, 21 Sep 2006 18:49:25 +0000 http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/09/21/wikipedia-vs-citizendium/#comment-2005 Hint to Andrew: Nupedia wasn't a wiki. The Citizendium is. Citizendium is an evolution beyond not Nupedia, but Wikipedia. Wait a few months and I think you'll see this. Hint to Andrew: Nupedia wasn’t a wiki. The Citizendium is. Citizendium is an evolution beyond not Nupedia, but Wikipedia.

Wait a few months and I think you’ll see this.

]]>