<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effective Censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/07/27/effective-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/07/27/effective-censorship/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=effective-censorship</link>
	<description>USC professor and author of The Wikipedia Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chloe</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/07/27/effective-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-166490</link>
		<dc:creator>chloe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/07/27/effective-censorship/#comment-166490</guid>
		<description>&quot;*most* people wonâ€™t even try to access banned content let alone attempt to circumvent filtering&quot; I think that this complements the concept of self-censorship to a certain extend. In a censored read write web, people will soon begin to stop attempting to read and write anything they know or feel will be filtered out - especially if there are heavy consequences involved. What is the point?

Even if the growth of the Internet surpasses the growth of censors, in a country where strict filters are constantly in place, I would believe that it is impossible for the internet to have grown much at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;*most* people wonâ€™t even try to access banned content let alone attempt to circumvent filtering&#8221; I think that this complements the concept of self-censorship to a certain extend. In a censored read write web, people will soon begin to stop attempting to read and write anything they know or feel will be filtered out &#8211; especially if there are heavy consequences involved. What is the point?</p>
<p>Even if the growth of the Internet surpasses the growth of censors, in a country where strict filters are constantly in place, I would believe that it is impossible for the internet to have grown much at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

