<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google access update</title>
	<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/06/04/google-access-update/</link>
	<description>New Media researcher</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Andrew Lih &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Afterword and Strategic Ambiguity</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/06/04/google-access-update/#comment-88</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/06/04/google-access-update/#comment-88</guid>
					<description>[...] Since many folks have pointed to my early report and workarounds, for completeness I should report that Google is back to &amp;#8220;normal&amp;#8221; reachability status in Beijing as of a few days ago. And by normal, I mean the normal GFW keyword and URL filtering is still in place. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Since many folks have pointed to my early report and workarounds, for completeness I should report that Google is back to &#8220;normal&#8221; reachability status in Beijing as of a few days ago. And by normal, I mean the normal GFW keyword and URL filtering is still in place. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
