<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your company&#8217;s Wikipedia entry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/06/02/your-companys-wikipedia-entry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/06/02/your-companys-wikipedia-entry/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=your-companys-wikipedia-entry</link>
	<description>USC professor and author of The Wikipedia Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcb21</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/06/02/your-companys-wikipedia-entry/comment-page-1/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>pcb21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewlih.com/blog/2006/06/02/your-companys-wikipedia-entry/#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew,

Whilst I agree with much of your article, it currently gives the impression that the &quot;famous&quot; Full Nice Handbag article was an example of an article ripe to be deleted because of NPOV problems etc. That is wrong. 

You may remember that several years ago, I was the one who tried to have the FNH article kept. I had nothing to do with the company (and doubt I ever will). I re-wrote the article in an NPOV manner after its initial submission meeting all your and Wikipedian guidelines. 

The deletion was all about notability of the subject. Yes I used that one article to crystallize a debate that I ultimately lost, and it is a good example of something, but not the subject of your article.

Yours,
Pcb21 (former Wikipedian, administrator and featured article author)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew,</p>
<p>Whilst I agree with much of your article, it currently gives the impression that the &#8220;famous&#8221; Full Nice Handbag article was an example of an article ripe to be deleted because of NPOV problems etc. That is wrong. </p>
<p>You may remember that several years ago, I was the one who tried to have the FNH article kept. I had nothing to do with the company (and doubt I ever will). I re-wrote the article in an NPOV manner after its initial submission meeting all your and Wikipedian guidelines. </p>
<p>The deletion was all about notability of the subject. Yes I used that one article to crystallize a debate that I ultimately lost, and it is a good example of something, but not the subject of your article.</p>
<p>Yours,<br />
Pcb21 (former Wikipedian, administrator and featured article author)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

